Agrarian research and development in Bulgaria during EU membership

Hrabrin Ianouchev BACHEV

Abstract


Abstract. Despite the greattheoretical and practical significance, in Bulgaria there are no comprehensiveanalysis of the state and evolution of agrarian research and development (ARD) activities. The goal of this paper is to analyze the state and evolution of ARD in Bulgaria during the period after country’s EU accession in 2007, identify major trends in that area, make a comparison with other EU states, specify main problems, and suggest conclusions for improvement of policies during next programing period. The analysis has found out that in years of EU membership the expenditures for ARD significantly decreased absolutely and relatively as a share in the total expenditures for R&D, which indicates diminishing importance, and deteriorating financial, personnel and material potential of agrarian knowledge and innovation sector. The most important sector for ARD in the country is the government in which more than 80% of overall expenditures for ARD are invested, as distribution of expenditures and organization of R&D in major sectors differ considerably from other EU member states. ARD in the country mainly are funded by the state budget, and the importance of budget financing relatedly increases during the period, unlike trends in other EU countries.

Keywords. Research and development, Agriculture, Sectors, Funding, AKIS, Bulgaria.

JEL. Q12, Q13, Q15, Q18.

Keywords


Research and development; Agriculture; Sectors; Funding; AKIS; Bulgaria.

Full Text:


References


Anandajayasekeram, P., & Gebremedhin, B. (2009). Integrating innovation systems perspective and value chain analysis in agricultural research for development: Implications and challenges. Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project Working Paper 16, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi.

Antle, J., Jones, J., & Rosenzweigc, C. (2017). Next generation agricultural system data, models and knowledge products: Introduction, Agricultural Systems, 155, 186–190. doi. 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.003

Bachev, H. (2018). Management and agrarian sustainability-impact of institutions in Bulgaria, International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 7(2), 113-142. doi. 10.18488/journal.11.2018.72.113.142

Bachev, H., & Labonne, M. (2000). About the organization of agrarian innovations, Station d'Economie et de SociologieRurale, EcoleNationaleSuperieureAgronomique (ENSA, INRA).

Bachev, H., & Mihailova, M. (2019). Analysis of the State of the System of Sharing of Knowledge and Innovations in Bulgarian Agriculture, EconPapers. [Retrieved from].

Bachev, H., Ivanov, B., Sokolova, E., & Toteva, D. (2017). Agricultural sustainability in Bulgaria - levels and factors, International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 6(2), 42-51.

Bashev, H., & Denchev, R. (1992). Economic efficiency of agricultural research, in issues in agricultural development, Occasional Paper Series, 6, 29-33.

Chartier, O., Doghmi, M., Fourcin, C., Broek, M. & Midmore, P. (2015). Investment in agricultural research in Europe: Synthesis Report, IMPRESA project, EC 7th Framework Programme.

DG AGRI, (2019). Various data.

EIP-AGRI, (2019). Brochure Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems. [Retrieved from].

EIP-AGRI EU SCAR, (2012). Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems in transition – a reflection paper, Brussels.

Eurostat, (2019). Variouse data. [Retrieved from].

European Commission, (2018). Proposal for a Regulation of the European parliament and of the concil establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, European Commission, Brussels, 1.6.2018

FAO (2019): Communication in research and development, FAO, [Retrieved from].

Mykhailova, L., Stoyanets, N., Mykhailov, A., Kharchenko, T., & Bachev, H. (2018). Sustainable development of the Ukrainian agrarian sector: perspectives and challenges, Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(3), 28-39. doi. 10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.03

NSI National Statistical Institute, (2019). Националенстатистическиинститут, various data. [Retrieved from].

Touzard, J., Temple, L., Faure, G., & Triomphe, B. (2015). Innovation systems and knowledge communities in the agriculture and agrifood sector: a literature review, Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 2(17), 117-142. doi. 10.3917/jie.017.0117

Özçatalbaş, O. (2017). Human development and research-development-extension relationships, in S. Maad (Edt.) Research and Development Evolving Trends and Practices - Towards Human, Institutional and Economic Sectors Growth, IntechOpen, doi. 10.5772/intechopen.69096

USDA, (2019). Agricultural Research Funding in the Public and Private Sectors, USDA, [Retrieved from].

Weißhuhn, P., Helming, K., & Ferretti, J. (2018). Research impact assessment in agriculture—A review of approaches and impact areas, Research Evaluation, 27(1), 36–42. doi. 10.1093/reseval/rvx034

World Bank, (2006). Enhancing agricultural innovation: How to go beyond the strengthening of research systems, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, Washington DC.

Virmani, S. (2013). Public-private partnership and policy reforms for effective agricultural research, development, and training, in G. Bhullar & N. Bhullar, Agricultural Sustainability, Elsevier.

Башев Х. (1998): Организациянааграрнитеиновации, Икономика и управлениенаселскотостопанство, 5, 16-25.

Башев Х. и М.Михайлова (2019): Състояние и развитиенааграрнатанаучноизследователска и развойнадейност в България, Икономика и управлениенаселскотостопанство, бр.3, 3-22.

Башев Х. и М.Михайлова (2019): Състояние, ефективност и факторизаразвитиенасистематазасподеляненазнания, иновации и дигитализация в селскотостопанство, Икономика и управлениенаселскотостопанство, бр.4, 3-23,

Иванов Б., Р. Попов, Х.Башев, Н. Котева, Н. Маламова, М. Чопева, К. Тодорова, И. Начева, Д.Митова (2020): ДОКЛАД АНАЛИЗ НА СЪСТОЯНИЕТО НА СЕЛСКОТО СТОПАНСТВО И ХРАНИТЕЛНОВКУСОВАТА ПРОМИШЛЕНОСТ SWOT АНАЛИЗ, ИАИ [Retrieved from].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/ter.v7i3.2048

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Turkish Economic Review - Turk. Econ. Rev. - TER - www.kspjournals.org

ISSN: 2149-0414

Editor: ter@ksplibrary.org   Secretarial: secretarial@ksplibrary.org   Istanbul - Turkey.

Copyright © KSP Library