Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Evaluating/auditing corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices

Muhammad Mustafa RASHID

Abstract


Abstract. The concepts of corporate social responsibility and social audit have been developed to a great extent in the last century. Analysis reveals a mature and sophisticated philosophical framework developed over the decades to enhance the relationship between the laborers, the state and the local government. Furthermore, there exists a framework to audit the economic and social activities of the business and a concern and focus in both the private sector and the public sector towards sustainable practices and a culture of ethical leadership. An audit criterion is developed and an examination of 3 top fortune companies reveals valuable insights into social audit and corporate social responsibility as well as the current best practices and benchmarks in the literature.

Keywords. Corporate responsibility, Social audit, Apple, Amazon, Mckesson.

JEL. M14.

Keywords


Corporate responsibility; Social audit; Apple, Amazon, Mckesson.

Full Text:


References


Amazon, (2020). Code of business conduct and ethics: Amazon.com, Inc. March 22. [Retrieved from].

Apple, (2018). Now globally powered by 100 percent renewable energy. Press Release. April 9. [Retrieved from].

Baig. E.C. (2019) Apple on the environment: Doing right for the planet is good for business. USA Today, April 11. [Retrieved from].

Boitnott, J. (2015). 6 Effective ways to enhance workplace productivity. March 27. [Retrieved from].

Clark, D. (2020). Delivering shipment zero, a vision for net zero carbon shipments. March 23, [Retrieved from].

Day, M., Roston, E., & Bloomberg, A. (2019). Grading Amazon on climate change: Better than walmart, worse than apple. March 23. [Retrieved from].

Dudovskiy. J. (2019). Apple corporate social responsibility (CSR). Research Methodology. May 3. [Retrieved from].

Environmental Responsibility Report. (2018). Progress Report, Covering Fiscal Year 2017. [Retrieved from].

Esakki, T. (2017). Green Marketing and Environmental Responsibility in Modern Corporations. IGI

Ferrell, F. & Ferrell, A. (2016). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases, 11thEd.

Global Giving Team, (2019). The CSR Report Checklist Every Company Needs. [Retrieved from].

Ismail, M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and its role in community development: An international perspective. The Journal of International Social Research, 2(9), 199-209.

Kardos, M., Garbor, M., & Cristache, N.R. (2019). Green marketing’s roles in sustainability and ecopreneurship case study: Green packaging’s impact on Romanian young consumers’ environmental responsibility. Sustainability, 11(3), 873. doi. 10.3390/su11030873

Kulsum, A., & Ernesto, S. (2018). Strategic Environmental Assessment for Policies: An Instrument for Good Governance. Washington, DC.: World Bank.

Liskova, Z., Cudlinova, E., Partlova, P., & Petr, D. (2016). Importance of green marketing and its potential. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 5(2), 61-64. Doi. 10.1515/vjbsd-2016-0012

Nickelsburg, M. (2020). Hundreds of Amazon employees protest company PR Policy by speaking out about climate change. March 23. [Retrieved from].

Price, R. W. (2012). What is a corporate social responsibility audit? [Retrieved from].

Pommer, S. (2018). Going above and beyond the public expectations for social responsibility. March 30. [Retrieved from].

Pommer, S. (2017). Why audit are not enough for social responsibility. [Retrieved from].

Rudnicka, A. (2017). Codes of conduct and codes of ethics as tools used to support the idea of social responsibility in supply chains. Research Papers of Wroclaw University of Economics, 91-100. doi. 10.15611/pn.2017.464.08

Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061. doi. 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630

Singh, C., & Prasad, M. (2017). Code of ethics in an organization. International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management, 10(9), 138-142. doi. 10.2648/IJAIEM.1122.2216




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jest.v8i4.2261

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Journal of Economic and Social Thought - J. Econ. Soc. Thoug. - JEST - www.kspjournals.org

ISSN: 2149-0422

Editor: jest@ksplibrary.org   Secretarial: secretarial@ksplibrary.org   Istanbul - Turkey.

Copyright © KSP Library